New Core Home
Curriculum
Content
Change Process
Implementation

|
 |
|
|
|
Implementation of the
New Core Curriculum
|
 |
|
Once the Walton College faculty approved the
new curriculum
structure, there were a number of implementation issues and questions to
be addressed:
- The new courses and associated teaching
materials had to be developed.
- Other curriculum issues like course
prerequisites and course substitutions for transfer students had to be
addressed.
- The transition from the old to the new
curriculum had to be planned.
- Since the new courses are not to be housed in
the traditional departments, a system for scheduling, staffing, and
coordinating the core courses had to be developed.
The following summarizes our approach to these
issues and includes the major documents associated with each set of decisions.
|
|
|
Spring 2002
Initial Course Outlines |
hide |
 |
| |
During the Spring 2002 semester, the Undergraduate Program Committee drafted
initial topical outlines for each of the new core courses and solicited faculty
comments. Many faculty members responded that the outlines were not detailed
enough for them to tell exactly what the course would cover. The Committee
decided to spend the summer constructing much more detailed course outlines
including detailed learning objectives.
The Associate Dean for Academic Affairs wrote a preliminary grant proposal to
the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Post-Secondary
Education (FIPSE) to obtain funding for course development teams. The response
was favorable and the College was asked to submit a final proposal. |
|
|
Spring 2002
Initial Course Outlines |
show |
 |
Summer 2002
Detailed Course Outlines, Other
Curriculum Issues, and FIPSE Grant |
hide |
 |
| |
|
Course Outlines
The Undergraduate Program Committee met once a week during the Summer of 2002
(the College provided stipend support). The Committee divided itself into 2-3
person subcommittees for each course in the core curriculum (i.e. members were
on 2 or 3 subcommittees). The objective for the summer was to develop a very
detailed outline for each course. Each outline was to have a brief narrative on
each section of the course and detailed learning objectives for that section
(written in the correct form using action verbs). The outline would also contain
the catalog description, prerequisites, and other items necessary for University
approval of the course.
view Course Outlines »
Other Curriculum Issues
The Undergraduate Program Committee also
developed recommendations to the faculty on a number of issues related to the
new curriculum. Recommendations were developed on the following issues:
- Course Sequence and Prerequisites
- It was recommended to change Data Analysis
from a second year course to a first year course so that it could be a
prerequisite for the sophomore integrated courses.
- It was recommended that the 6 hours of
Business Strategy and Planning be combined into one 6 hour course rather
than two 3 hour courses.
- Pre-business Requirements
- Pre-business courses and required grade
standards
- Exceptions to pre-business requirements
- Transfer Policies
- Monitoring of pre-business grades from
transfer institutions
- Substitutes for Core Courses
- Concurrent Enrollment at other Institutions
- This recommendation was accepted by the
faculty but subsequent implementation difficulties led the committee to
reverse its recommendation. The policy will not be implemented.
- Specifying the Courses for the Additional (or
Business) Social Science Requirement
- General Education Elective Policy
- The committee dropped its recommendation
that 9 of the 16 hours be in a single concentration because of
implementation difficulties. They substituted a restriction on the number of
physical or dance education hours that may be included.
- Adjustments to the Minor for Non-business
Students
The full text of these recommendations may be
viewed here:
view
Policy and Implementation Recommendations »
FIPSE Grant Final Proposal
The Committee assisted in drafting the final proposal to the Comprehensive
Program of the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of
Post-Secondary Education (FIPSE). The proposal requested $230,000 funding for
course releases and summer grants for faculty members to serve on course
development teams. Each three person team (four person team for the 6 hour
Business Strategy and Planning course) will work in the 12 months before the new
course in first offered to develop detailed implementation plans and teaching
materials. A major part of the FIPSE proposal was a plan for evaluating the
curriculum revision. Five learning goals were specified with plans to access
each.
The College was notified in August 2002 that the proposal was funded. The text
of the proposal may be viewed here:
view FIPSE Final
Proposal » |
|
|
Summer 2002
Detailed Course Outlines, Other
Curriculum Issues, and FIPSE Grant |
show |
 |
Fall 2002
Implementation Planning and Course
Development Team Selection |
hide |
 |
| |
Curriculum Report to the Faculty
At the end of the summer, the Committee delivered a spiral bound Curriculum
Revision Report to each Walton College faculty member. The report consisted of
the main text of the FIPSE proposal, the course outlines, and the policy and
implementation recommendations (discussed above). The latter two items were the
substance of the course and program changes that had to be approved by the
University. After a round of meetings with each department that produced no
significant calls for revision, the Undergraduate Program Committee formally
recommended the changes for faculty approval. The motion to approve was passed
by a 96 percent majority.
Implementation Planning
On September 14, 2002, the Walton College Executive Committee (Dean, Associate
Dean, Assistant Dean, and department chairs) met in retreat. A major item of
discussion was planning for implementation of the new curriculum. The materials
prepared for that discussion (including annotations summarizing decisions) can
be viewed here:
view
Implementation
Issues w/Executive Committee »View
Core Curriculum
Tables...
Course Development Team Selection
The FIPSE grant provides funding the compensate faculty for serving on course
development teams. The funding is sufficient to hire an adjunct to release each
team member for one course of teaching responsibility in a Fall and Spring
semester and provide each of the team members with a $6,000 summer grant. Each
team will work on course development in the 12 months before their course is to
be first offered and then teach the course in the first two years it is offered.
The charge to the teams includes the following objectives:
The team for each course will be responsible for:
- Further development of the course outline and
learning objectives
- Significant departures from the current
course outline must be approved by the Undergraduate Program Committee
- Development of plans to incorporate
international issues, ethics, diversity, and written and oral communication,
as appropriate
- Development of teaching materials that can be
supplied to faculty needing to prepare to teach the course --- and that can be
made accessible to faculty at other universities (FIPSE dissemination plan).
- These materials should be so detailed that
they provide a detailed blueprint on how to implement the course for the
faculty member who wants the guidance.
- Development of assessment methods to determine
the degree to which learning objectives are being achieved.
- Plan and implement faculty development
activities for the first group of faculty to teach the course
Even though the work of the various teams will
span a three year period as the new courses are phased in, it was decided to
identify all the teams at the same time so that they and their department chair
could plan ahead for their course release. An e-mail was sent to the faculty
soliciting volunteers and some of the most prominent members of the faculty
volunteered to serve. This was a very significant tangible sign of the Walton
College faculty's support for the curriculum change. The full text of the letter
of agreement signed by team members may be viewed here:
view Development Team
letter »
|
|
|
Fall 2002
Implementation Planning and Course
Development Team Selection |
show |
 |
Spring 2003
Course Development Begins and
More Implementation Planning |
hide |
 |
| |
|
Course Development
In January 2003, the three person course development teams for WCOB 1023,
Business Foundations and WCOB 1033, Data Analysis and Interpretation began their
work. These courses will be first taught in Spring 2004. The latest products of
their course development can be viewed here:
coming soon »
Each team is working with an instructional
designer from the Walton College Technology Mediated Learning Team. A narrative
description of the course development process can be viewed at:
view
Course Development Process »
Course Scheduling and Staffing
Based on the initial implementation planning in Fall 2002, detailed policies and
procedures for scheduling and staffing the core classes were proposed, debated,
and agreed upon. Most of the core courses will have their home in a
quasi-department (Walton College of Business Department, WCBD) instead of a
traditional department and will have a WCOB course prefix. New methods of
scheduling and staffing these courses had to be devised. There were two
exceptions to:
- The principles of economics courses retain
their departmental course prefix (ECON) because the courses continue to be
part of the University core courses. These courses (ECON 2013 & ECON 2023)
will continue to be scheduled and staffed by the Department of Economics.
- The revised business law course, WCOB 1012,
Legal Environment of Business, will continue to be taught by a specialized
faculty and scheduled and staffed by the department that traditionally
performed these tasks (Accounting).
It was decided to create a quasi-department chair
position, Business Core Curriculum Director. This person would schedule the core
courses and work with department chairs to staff the courses. The job
description of the Business Core Curriculum Director can be viewed here:
view Job
Description »
It was also necessary to devise a system of determining core course staffing
obligations across departments. At the September 2002 Executive Committee
retreat it was decided that initially the staffing obligations should be based
on the proportion of the old core semester credit hours staffed by each
department. The long term goal is to make core course staffing obligations
roughly equal across departments. The policy proposal on the detailed procedures
to implement these goals can be viewed here:
view Staffing
New Core Courses »
view Teaching
Obligations »
view
Enrollment Estimates »
Course Coordinators
The issue of the role of course coordinators for the core courses generated
quite a bit of Executive Committee discussion. The discussion was initiated at
the September 2002 Executive Committee retreat and continued intermittently into
the Spring 2003 semester. It was finally decided that we would use course
coordinators. The policy proposal and associated Executive Committee decisions
can be viewed here:
view Course
Coordinators - E Comm Decisions »
view
Course Coordinators - Dept. Chair Handbook »
CPA Exam Eligibility
The Arkansas State Board of Public Accountancy regulates eligibility for sitting
for the CPA exam in Arkansas. Their requirement listed specific course titles
which are not included in this new curriculum. We requested that the Board
consider a modification to its eligibility rules and used the topical coverage
spreadsheet in the "Curriculum Structure and Content" section to help make the
case. The Board approved the following modification (change in bold)
A total of 150 semester hours of college credits from an institution
accredited by one of the major regional accreditation associations or other
accrediting organization recognized by the Board as being comparable, including,
at least, a Baccalaureate degree and a concentration in accounting, and
including the courses listed below, provided, however, some portion of the
hours of instruction constituting a course identified below may be taught as a
portion of another subject matter course when the college has designed its
course structure as a business process concept, or other similar strategy, to
include multiple subjects required by this paragraph as part of a single course
and that the course alone or combined with other courses contain the minimum
number of hours of instruction in the required subject to equal a conventional
three hour course, which must be completed no later that the same
semester in which the exam is taken.
|
|
|
Spring 2003
Course Development Begins and
More Implementation Planning |
show |
 |
This project is sponsored in part by
the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE),
U.S. Department of Education.
visit: FIPSE
Dept. of Education |
|
|
|